Resumo

It is popularly said that when a person looses one sense, there is compensation by the other remaining senses to suppress the loss. Throughout three Phsycophysic Experiments based on Inhibition of Return Posner’s Paradigm and Functional Magnetic Resonance (fMRI) Techniques, congenital deaf people were compared to normal hearing people in order to check if deaf people possess different attentional pattern compared to normal hearing people, and if the same cortical areas – Wernicke and Broca’s area and Hearing Cortex – were activated in both groups. Experiment I consisted on pressing a button every time the presence of a big square (target) was detected by subjects while non-predictive small squares (cue) were also presented at the same or opposite side of the target. It was observed that both groups presented Posner’s Paradigm classical phenomena: Facilitation or Inhibition of Return, what suggested the possibility that attentional pattern may be similar to both groups. Therefore, it was observed that normal hearing people were faster than deaf people to respond to the task when time interval between cue and target was long (800 ms) when compared to the time they spent to respond when time interval between cue and target as short (100 ms). Experiment I raised the hypotheses that possibly deaf people may present a temporal processing difference. At Experiment I every condition was randomly presented. Experiment II was elaborated to highlight MRT differences between short and long time intervals, so every time interval was presented on a fixed order. Comparison of Experiment I and II (Fixed Time Intervals) showed that normal hearing people presented shorter Manual Reaction Times (MRT), while deaf people kept the same averages despite the temporal advantage, what suggested that deaf people may present a deficit on temporal processing. Experiment III used Posner’s Paradigm while subjects were submitted to fMRI scanning in order to check if activated cortical regions could be similar in both groups. MRI images showed no hypotrophy at hearing cortex deaf people. fMRI images demonstrate Wernicke and Broca’s area and hearing cortex activations in both groups while executing the task, which, although did not have any explicit semantic content, had time as the main physical parameter on which subjects could be based to increase performance to respond to the task. Time is one of the oral language primary physical parameter, different of signed language which has visual and spatial parameters as primaries. Results suggest that cortical audition center activations may indicate a cross-modal plasticity at the deaf group. Yet, participation of hearing cortex on strategy elaboration to respond to a task which does not have any explicit semantic content possibly indicates the participation of hearing cortex on language processing.